Categories
presentations

Searching conversations: Twitter, Facebook & the Social Web – Greg Notess

Conversation as database – public conversations that may or may not disappear. If NSA can data mine public conversations, can libraries? Privacy lines are blurring, some are getting creeped out by the public info that is out there – it’s our job to teach our users that the info is there and others can find it. He also discussed semi-public communities- members only, but archived. What is archived? Where is it archived? Reliance on other humans to help keep your assumed private communications private – both the recipients and the folks who are reading our ‘net transmissions (ISPs, hackers, NSA, etc.). Privacy by obscurity! Who cares about much of the info posted?
He then talked about Old Databases – email & email lists, Usenet (Google Groups) and web forums – these are all searchable & archived. Usenet (now Google Groups) is useful for folks who were active in computers in the 70’s and beyond. All the Usenet posts are still archived. Discussion forums are still in use, too – some are getting wise and making questions freely searchable, but answers require paying membership in the forum. Email & email lists – forward your email to Yahoo! Or Gmail or download the copies for easy searching for yourself. Lists sometimes limit searching archives to subscribers only – becoming a member will give you that access and you can set your subscription to nomail if you don’t want the actual emails coming in, just searching access. No web-based archive means email search via listserv software – tedious, but useful without an archive – your users probably don’t know they can do that at all.
Summize – search reviews/opinions – added Twitter search – became Twitter searching by default, then got bought by Twitter. Greg brought up Summize and the hash tag made it to the top of the most active hash tags. Sweet! Then he brought up the page again and my tweet about the fact that we are active folks was on top. Entertaining! He spent a good deal of time discussing the options that Summize offers. Other options to search twitter are: Tweetscan, search people on Twitter itself, web search engines (will get some).
Facebook searching – you can see profiles from your networks and partial profiles from friends of your friends or folks who are in your networks. Wide membership in networks and such will help you see more profiles. He then showed how to set privacy settings so that you aren’t quite so searchable. You can also find out about community and group demographics, too. Facebook postings aren’t necessarily permanent – but they can be if someone else grabs the photo or the quote and reposts it. Otherwise, if it goes away on your page, it’s gone.
Spokeo – get information from social sites by entering in an email address and seeing where they are signed up and, if public, get the info from their profiles. Hmmm, I’m definitely going to have to check my own email addresses out on this one… Techniques – try to find all the known email address for your search subject, ignore the friend uploading option, get more content from them for a fee.
Comments and tags – conversation occurs here too – don’t forget to search through these to get info.
Question time:
Can you search on Twitter search for orgs using a twitter widget? Nope, probably not. Maybe a search engine search for the name or code used might give you the info
What about searching LinkedIn? Searching is much more limited, not as complete as Facebook.

Categories
presentations

The blog post formerly known as “notes on David Lee King’s presentation”

I just lost the entire first part of my notes in a horrible wireless incident. All I can say is that for an INTERNET LIBRARIAN conference, I’m not getting much Internet. There are a lot of people tweeting about how crappy the wifi situation is and it’s bad enough that it’s distracting from the conference experience itself. Funny, since David is talking about digital experience, and my particular digital experience during his talk is not good. Not his fault, of course, and my “meatspace” experience is wonderful – he’s a funny presenter who has a LOT of great knowledge (and he rocks) but I’m having trouble concentrating on the message because the digital experience of this conference is so very bad. The really bad part – you all are getting this rant instead of reading about what David has to say. The good news? He’s written a book called Designing the Digital Experience that you can buy from Amazon and get all the good info there.
Our first keynote, which was part of the notes I’d lost in the wireless incident, was by Harold Reingold. He spoke about his recent book, Smart Mobs, and discussed the idea of collective action. He traced it from early man collecting together in order to bring down a big beast (mastodon steaks, anyone?) to the first cities and the birth of writing, to the printing press and finally to the advent of texting and the Internet. It was an interesting keynote and I took some kick-butt notes, but they are gone…. He also mentioned that, instead of keeping up with technologies, keep up with literacies. That struck me as a really good idea and well put, too!

Categories
presentations

Pre-conference on Project Management

Project Management: The Prize is in the Process
Helene Blowers – Director of Digital Strategy & Macrina Gilliam – Applications Project Manager from the Columbus Metropolitan Library
Participant introductions – lots of cool people here!
Problems dump – everyone yells out issues they’ve had with projects in the past
Helene – policy, passion & practice
She wrote the book on project management for the Belk Corporation in 1995.
A project is a one-time job that has starting/stopping points, objectives, & defined scope of work.
• Required stuff – time frame, resources & scope
Extremely valuable stuff
o a champion –boss or not, whomever gains the most, will be most supportive
o passion (passion will take your projects really far – farther than project management, really)
• Project managers
o Influence #1 (coordinators – usually not managing people directly – but are influencers)
o Look beyond managers (managers do not have to manage all the projects)
o Communication skills
o Leadership potential
• Strategies are not projects and strategies aren’t projects – if the project doesn’t fit in with the organization’s strategies, why do it?
• 3 questions to answer in a project scope doc – what are we doing? Who is doing it? When are we doing it? And Why are we doing it?
• PM constraints – balancing constraints of time, resources, & scope
Slides will be posted on librarybytes.com
Macrina – Columbus Metropolitan Library’s Project Management Life Cycle
Hand-outs that detail the process they use, best practices and checklists of project tasks from their library
Project Management Life Cycle
o Initiate
o Plan
o Execute
o Close
Typical Roles
o Project Sponsor
o Process Owner/Product Owner
o Project Manager
o IT Advisor
o Subject Matter Expert (SMEs)
o “Blue Zone” – project support resources (Marketing, property management staff to help move stuff, etc.) – communicate early with these folks to let them know what they will need to do and can schedule your project and possibly think of things you haven’t thought of
We don’t manage projects, we manage initiatives – Helene speaking of an old job
Project management should be understood throughout the entire organization
10 phases divided among the 4 processes of the life cycle – and opportunities to communicate come through many of them
o Discovery-Prototyping-Beta phase
o Iterative development saves time later
o Increases input and buy-in
o Higher quality result
o let go of being perfect
“Librarians don’t really have the concept of ‘quick & dirty’ do we?” – Mary Auckland
Added a final phase to the process cycle – transitioning project results to the process owner so that there is a “person in charge” and the project’s result continues (web site (content manager type), self-check (circ manager or worker), IM reference (ref staff or manager)) and that the opportunities, user needs and improvement needs are monitored in an ongoing way.
Helene – process owners/project managers (9 people who are blue zone “folks”) meet every Friday to discuss resource shifting and project needs – total buy-in from all throughout the organization. The “blue zone” gets rid of info silos and lets cross-departmental communication happen easily.
http://cmlpresentations.pbwiki.com – handouts and info from slides
Amanda Etches-Johnson – One Person Project Management
Slides – http://blogwithoutalibrary.net/talk/il2008/pm.pdf
Handout – http://blogwithoutalibrary.net/talk/il2008/pm_handout.pdf
Went to a project management workshop in Feb to help her with her upcoming web redesign project and it changed her life – got lots of great info but realized that as a one-person team only uses parts of the process.
She discussed project management at her library – there are a lot of projects going on at her library and varying levels of PM training with no enterprise PM framework in place (yet). They just named a new special projects librarian and Amanda thinks she’ll start implementing more of a PM culture. Right now, there are no expectations for communication or documentation, no sponsors of particular projects which was both positive (get things done really fast) and negative (no expectations means varying degrees of communication).
Created an advisory committee from the people who she wanted to be on the project team – they have full time jobs, too, though and couldn’t commit to being true team members. Perhaps a true PM culture would have helped?
“Where does the planning stop and the doing start?” – worked on planning, took a while to realize she needed to actually start doing.
Tips to keep you sane:
o Beware over-planning
o Timeline in 1-week chunks
o Deadlines are your friend
Best practices still apply
o Project charter
o Title
o Synopsis
o Scope
o Dates
o Resources
o Stakeholders
o Version control
o Keeps you on track
o Especially important for tech projects
o Watch for scope creep
o Stick to the plan
o More features – more time OR resources (or both)
o Break the project into manageable chunks
o Manage expectations (communication, communication, communication)
o Document
Some best practices don’t apply
o Gantt charts
o Complex PM software
She spent 2 days with advisory committee to get info architecture and first 2 levels of site wireframed – hugely helpful. Amanda also created working groups that were dealing with specific issues and have a short, firm timeline. Mary mentioned that she calls them “start and finish groups”.
Everyone is your project team! Don’t isolate yourself – the whole library can be your project team – they are all invested in the content and functionality of the site.
Question period
From the discussion:
o Shortish projects help keep people from losing interest
o Lessons learned become institutional memory for what works & doesn’t work
o Helene used an email newsletter (with updates from each department or project team members) and the unique communication method made a huge impact
o Too much functionality at once can cause issues with troubleshooting – when things go wrong, you don’t know what exactly doesn’t work, it could be anything that you are working on
o Determine a “main project” and the tentacles that come off of it- and decide if you need those tentacles
o The new generation is going to make us do things their way – and even if we don’t like it, we’ll have to in order to keep our users
Themes from Mary – wrap up times
o The value of planning up-front – but it needs to stop too, create a deadline for planning phase
o Breaking projects into manageable chunks
o Bringing passion into the team
o The PM team is more widespread than you think
o Achieve more communication through influencing than just straight communication (reports, etc)
o High-level sponsors/champions can do your communicating to the top levels for you
o Lots of the stumbling blocks mentioned at the beginning were answered in the presentations
o Managing by consensus/committee – PM process helps to alleviate some of that

Categories
conference presentations

SQUEEE!!

A Squee Moment In The Middle Of My Day

Borrowing a term from Christopher Gould of MOBIUS, I had a squee moment as I was checking my email today. The conference that I went to last month (National Association of Government Webmasters) sent out the compiled evaluations to presenters. They put them all neatly in a spreadsheet, gave averages for each 1-5 rating and included the comments on the same row as the rating scores. I felt that, according to the number of drinks purchased for me the night after my presentation and the number of people who commented favorably on it as I was imbibing those drinks, the presentation had gone well. I had no idea *how* well, however.
My average scores, on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) were all above 4.2 – most were in the 4.5 or 4.6 range. The “average of my averages” was 4.5 out of the 36 people who turned in evaluations. That’s a lot of 5’s!! The comments, though, were truly wonderful. I did have some constructive criticism (one person felt that my visuals needed more color) and I LOVE getting those – they help make the next presentation better – but much of the commentary was positively blushworthy.
Stuff like, “Very interesting subject. Great presenter.” and “Perfect balance between technical and non-technical info. Engaging presenter. Would love to hear from her again!” and “Great content. Well done. Thanks Robin” were enough to make me giddy. You better bet they are going on my “raves and reviews” page!

Categories
presentations

Vietnamese food = yummy!

Last night, in what I sincerely hope will become a conference tradition for me, Natasha, Qhyrrae and I went out for Vietnamese food. It was seriously yummy, but – even beyond the yumminess – it provided us with a venue for a great conversation. All of us had been to various programs throughout the day and were excited about all the information we’d picked up. The nice part about going to conferences like this with co-workers was that we not only shared the information, but got a chance to discuss the possibilities of implementation of that information in an informal setting. I won’t bore you all with details about the various schemes we hatched (MWAHAHAHAHA), but I will tell you that this makes going to conferences, putting up with crappy hotels and being away from the family (not that this is always a bad thing…) and all the other inconveniences that we put up with completely worth it. Even though I was excited by a lot of the information I picked up during the day, I got even more excited by the prospect of it going into practice at my library! This year has been a lot of conferencing on my own, and being able to process through the info with smart, dedicated co-workers at this conference made it special!

Categories
conference presentations

My session

During this year’s MLA conference, I presented on Collaborating In The Cloud, a reprise of the session I first did in Jamaica in June. It seemed to go pretty well, with a lot of questions afterward and a lot of nodding and “a-ha” moments from the crowd. Bobbi was kind enough to snap a few pics of me in action during the presentation, so I’ll let you all check out the wiki and a quickly posted blog post of my presentation from an attendee and leave you with the pics…

DSC00388 DSC00386 DSC00384

Categories
presentations

Webinar Day!

It’s not up yet, but in the near future, the archived version of the webinar I did for MaintainIT today will be available via Webjunction soon. It was a lot of fun to do and I think it went pretty well. Brenda and Sarah (previously featured on this very blog as dinner companions for Vietnamese food in Anaheim, CA) made everything happen quite smoothly – I didn’t have to deal with any tech issues, they really kept on top of things!
My next webinar of the day (this one as an attendee) is on Social Networking and security. I really appreciated the fact that the presenter, Beth Young of MORENet, was not alarmist about the possibility of predators on the ‘net. She gave some hard statistical facts and showed that our teens are FAR more likely to be drinking this weekend than getting sexually solicited online (that doesn’t even mean that they respond, meet or have sex with anyone – just the solicitation). She then talked about lots of things that kids do that will get them into trouble on the ‘net (self-posted child porn – camera phone pics taken for a boy/girl friend who may not be as careful about who they share those pics with…). Then she discussed the Megan Meier case and the laws that have come to pass because of that case, including the law passed on June 30th of this year targeting stalking and harassment on the Internet.
Beth then switched gears and discussed creating a profile and protecting information online. She mentioned that one speaker at a recent Internet safety night asked that you consider taking anything that you want to post on a social site and imagine writing it on posterboard with your picture attached and putting it up at the mall. Great analogy! Then she discussed the idea of your public life (job) and social profiles. This covered the idea of jobs and hiring managers checking profiles. Something I haven’t heard much about was the idea of respecting the privacy of *others* – the folks in your pictures or videos as well as people you talk about. If your “facts” about someone prove to be incorrect, you can be liable for damages. Cops use these profiles, too…
She then talked about caching – google cache, wayback machine, etc. Even if you take stuff down, it isn’t necessarily gone! She finished with some good tips for students from BlogSafety.com. This was followed by some reporting tips and a dense slide FULL of great resources. This is why we archive these things, I imagine – I’ll have to come back to this one! Oh! She just made it available to download – and it’s now living on my computer! Sweet!
And with the end of those, I’m thinking it’s Margarita time – it’s been a long stressful day and I’m ready for some relaxing “me” time!

Categories
presentations

A somewhat delayed NAGW overview

Coming back to work and getting back in the swing of things took the wind out of my sails… I haven’t had a chance to sit down and regurgitate (lovely image, eh?) my experience at NAGW yet, but now I’m sitting at the public computer desk at work and have a few minutes, so prepare for some thoughts!
I didn’t post much about the last day, mostly because I was a bit under-the-weather (read “hung over”) that morning and slept all afternoon to make up for it. The morning session, a preview of IE8, was interesting, but not groundshaking. There were some interesting bits coming out of the Microsoft camp – nothing that can’t be recreated in Firefox with a nice extension or two – but nothing earth shattering. The Web Slices thing is also something that is nice, but not necessary and will just cause more work for webmasters when something like dapper.net is already available for the few sites that don’t already produce RSS feeds. IE8 looks good, but it won’t cause me to toss my Firefox install any time soon!
After that, as I said, I slept until it was time to go to the Zanies Comedy Club to see Kevin Nealon. That was a lot of fun and very, very funny to boot! I enjoyed myself immensely. Then it was straight to bed and a 7 hour car ride home.
Now that I’ve been home for a few days and have had a chance to digest my experiences at NAGW (see, there’s that regurgitation thing again – I’m sensing a theme), I’m ready to let you all know that this is one of the best conferences I’ve attended yet. It was small and intimate (so we all ate together and that fostered a sense of community) but it was also packed with quality information, vendors and “stuff”. The bag and swag I got were phenomenal! I was duly impressed…
Next year’s conference will be in Galveston, TX and I’m truly hoping that I will be able to make it. It’s almost twice as far from me as Chicago is – that might be a bit of a stretch to drive and flying is always a “can I find a really good price” sort of thing.

Categories
conference presentations

My Session – Web 3.0

Wow. I was way more nervous than I thought I would be – first time doing this one, you know. This means that I practiced and re-thought the presentation a lot!! It seemed to have paid off. The presentation was very well attended with lots of people paying pretty close attention to a LOT of information thrown at them in the space of about an hour. I talked for a bit over an hour, then we had a really, really good discussion for the next 20 minutes or so. There were a lot of people who were really thinking while I presented and had some great comments and observations. I’ve already made changes to my wiki in response to the discussions from the end of the session!
The wiki was well received as well – lots of people commented that they really liked the idea. It’s something I’ve been doing for EVERY presentation I do these days. Something else I did, this idea came from my co-presenter for the Becoming 2.0 class, is to get a label for my cards with the wiki’s address and slapped it onto a bunch of them for take-homes. They went pretty quickly, too!
All-in-all it went very, very well. I’ve been talking RDF and XML with folks all afternoon – and it’s been fun!

Categories
presentations

Prototyping

My first pre-conference session! It was very interesting with LOTS of great information. My notes, as the information came at me, are below. Enjoy ’em!

Marc Drummond
Web Technologies Coordinator
City of Minnetonka

What tools can I learn?
When should I use each tool?
How do I use each tool?

Prototyping = an approximation of an actual design
Lo-Fi vs. Hi-Fi

Tools:

* Paper
* Wireframes
* Gray-Box
* Photoshop Comps
* PowerPoint
* XHTML & CSS
* Interactive prototypes

Discussion of what prototyping we’ve done turned into a discussion of designing for resolution. 15% still use 600×800 and these are gov’t sites, so there were lots of opinions.

Content first!
Challenges in getting content – content brief gives deadlines/responsibilities – discussion of getting content from busy people. Embarrassment/shame works…
Page Description Diagram – focus on content/hierarchy
Exercise – create a Page Description Diagram with Creative/Content brief provided

Developing Layout Concepts
Info design first! Layout second.
Elements of layouts:

* container
* identity block
* primary/secondary navigation
* other navigation
* content
* footer
* whitespace!

Purpose of navigation
Purpose of design = make them look at something specific
Discussion of grid theory/golden ratio
Thumbnail sketches – make ’em early & often
Exercise – create at least 10 thumbnails (I got 6 done)

Break – they have Red Bull as well as all different kinds of soda on the break tables. So typical of web/coders…

Paper Prototyping
great for usability testing
Lots of info on testing – paper prototyping as the base, writing a script for the test, (in response to question) creating “tests” for the site, recruiting testers, testing team design (facilitator, user, “computer”, note-taker), take time between sessions to process – but don’t make changes between sessions, review results, make changes, test again
Example of paper prototyping using volunteers for us to see a working example – handy!! Discussion followed on the advantages/disadvantages to the process.

Wireframes = page skeletons used as storyboards
Tools – Visio, OmniGraffle, etc. to create wireframes
Notate – project name, page name, version number, last rev date, author, copyright on template for the site
What should be wireframed
Challenges of wireframing

Grey Boxing
Adobe Fireworks CS3 examples – learned about layer comps & how to use them – cool stuff!

Design issues
Color picking/psychology of color
Color Tech (brightness, RGB vs. CMYK, etc.)
Color picking advice

Illustrator examples – coolest tool in existence = Live Color – recolors your prototype VERY easily, and lets you save any of the schemes you create with it. I’m going to have to play more with Illustrator.

Creating effective communication – quick tips on design decisions to make your communication effective…
Typographical considerations – lots of considerations – spacing, justification, sizes, punctuation, test fonts at typetester.maratz.com
Design effects (lines, gradients, etc.) to help draw attention to content and make ’em pretty, make images with people face your content to draw the eye, choosing images, etc.

Interactive Prototypes – XHTML/CSS
clickable wireframe
good for complex scripting testing
Reusable – maybe, can be timewaster…
Use a good browser to develop in, test in nasty browsers next

Demo of prototyping in Fireworks – continued from before, added information to the grey boxes he made earlier, showed how to quickly create multi-page prototypes in FW, showed how to link from master page to pages he just created. Very cool stuff – I had no idea… Once this is done, exporting all the pages as basic web pages is easy. Too cool…

More Fireworks tricks – use Common Library to make buttons and other “doo-dads” without any real work – great for quickly working up forms and such.

Finally – review of prototyping process

  • Content
  • Thumbnails
  • Grey Box
  • Advance design
  • Interactive prototype
  • test, test, test (all through the process)
Relation Browser
Timeline
0 Recommended Articles:
0 Recommended Articles: